About Zappers
The following is theoretical discussion and not a recommendation for usage.
Zappers are small, lightweight, electronic devices that use safe, mild electric pulses to help kill microbes such as bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and potentially virus, in water based environments and while not specific for such use, can do so without harming the cells of the human body or of advanced animals. You might ask how the zapper can distinguish between microbes and advance animals and the answer is that the zapper does not know any difference, but there is a physiological difference that allows it to work.
The first noticeable difference is that most microbes possess a rigid cell wall or cell membrane that is stressed when the electric pulses applied resonate with the structure of those membranes. The continued resonance, over time causes the membranes to fail. We can see examples of this in the real world, such as the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows bridge, which resonated in the wind. This mechanism of resonant collapse or failure allows devices such as zappers to kill microbes in water, as well as in the body of humans or animals although they are not sold for that purpose and are not medical devices. This effect can be easily demonstrated by zapping a jar of pond water, where the disappearance of the microbes can be visibly seen.
Another possible mechanism of action, produced by some products, is activation of the immune system where the white blood cells sense the resonant vibration of foreign microbes and respond by attacking them. Zappers that use this mechanism do not kill microbes in water because they have a weaker output but they can be somewhat effective in humans or animals. A stronger zapper, however, can produce both effects, killing microbes directly and at the same time, produce a notice to the immune system that the microbes are present.
So, how does this relate to the elimination of worms such as flukes from the body? There is still a bit that is not known in this respect. Current regulations are not conductive to studying products that are not profitable to mainstream medicine. However, what we do know is that many worms rely on certain symbiotic microbes, such as Wolbachia, in order to survive. If you are able to kill these microbes, then the worms will die shortly after. The use of zappers against worms has a spotty record which will be explained.
So, is it necessary to have a fancy expensive zapper to help fight things such as colds or flu? No, many people have had reasonable results in fighting colds and flu by doing a process called battery tapping.
About Battery Tapping
It can stop a cold or flu in its tracks but may not be as effective on other problems. To try battery tapping, simply wet the index fingers of both hands. Place the index finger of the left hand on one battery terminal and tap the other terminal as fast as you can with the right index finger for 7 minutes or longer. After the 7 minute or longer time, stop and rest for 20 minutes. Repeat the tapping for the same amount of time that you did the first time, stop and rest for another 20 minutes. Then repeat for at least a third time and if possible, a fourth time. It is important to understand that tapping for less than 7 minutes can have negative effects and that tapping less than 3 times can have negative effects. Do it correctly.
Note that it is important to do this at the first symptom of the flu or a cold because the zapper only stops the progression of these conditions. The zapper can not undo what has already occurred.
As I am sure that you can see, battery tapping can be a cumberson, tiring process and a regimin that would be hard to do for several days in a row. This is one main reason that people either buy zappers or try to build them themselves.
While it is not too difficult for anyone to build a generic zapper, when you are finished, all you have is a generic zapper that may or may not be working. I have seen many home made zappers that did not actually work. Those that work, generally do not produce the best quality output and are generally not accurate.
Zapper Features
- Frequencies: Dual vs Single Frequency vs Quad Frequency vs Multi Frequency? Honestly, the more frequencies the better the results that you can expect, simply because if one frequency does not work well, another might do better and a thid or 4th may work just right.
Of course, more frequencies cost more. There are some single frequency zappers that claim to be the best, but the truth is, if a single frequency could be even close to being best, then why would other companies go to the trouble of producing dual frequencies, quad frequencies, or even more frequencies?.
Some people might want to claim that things such as multiple frequencies are sales gimmicks, but that literally is not true. Shooting at something once might hit the target or it might miss. Perhaps that is why six-shooter revolvers were invented.
The truth is that dual frequencies offer more effectiveness than single frequency zappers, so a single frequency zapper would pale in comparison to a dual frequency unit with similar characteristics. Quad frequency zappers are even better, if they have all of the other important features. Eight or more frequencies can produce even better results.
The best zapper will have more of the frequencies needed to do the job.
As an analogy, would you rather have a 1 cylinder lawn mower engine in your car?
A two culinder? Four cylinders?, Six cylinders? OR more?
ParaZapper ™CC2 has a total of 29 frequencies in 6 modes with better accuracy.
ParaZapper ™UZI-3 has a total of 41 frequencies in 8 ranges with better accuracy and more power.
ParaZapper ™MY has a total of over 80 frequencies in 20 mode selections with the best accuracy.
ParaZapper ™MY has a total of over 120 frequencies in 26 mode selections with the best accuracy.
- Accurate Frequencies: Dr. Hulda Clark claimed that any frequency would work and to a degree, she was right. Some frequencies, however, are much better than others. Royal Raymond Rife's machine preceded Dr. Clark's zapper by many years and was far superior in many respects. While the Clark zapper provides a basic coverage with good but minimal effects, the use of Rife frequencies and technology far exceedes the Clark zapper. But in order for these frequencies to have their maximum effect, they must be very close to the exact frequency. This is another place where micro-controller based zappers are better. The main reason that accuracy is important is that it offers you confidence that you are going to get as good of effects with one unit of the same model as another unit of the same model.
The best zapper will have more of the accurate frequencies to do the job.
ParaZapper ™MY and MY+Plus offer the most accurate frequencies.
- Stabilized output All of our zappers have a limited form of this for technical and safety reasons. While one zapper maker claims that this is great, we do not see any significant gains over the original zapper. From our testing results, it does not produce significantly better results. Additionally, any zapper with the super stabilized output does not meet Dr. Clark's requirement for positive output or for having no negative pulses. In our opinion, the super stabilized output is only hype and is only promoted by one manufacturer. Another problem with the super stabilized zapper is the absence of the output resistance as required by Dr. Clark. This basically results in an uncontrolled output that may cause nerve damage. For this reason, the super stabilized output does not meet Dr. Clark's requirements. A better, safer output that meets Dr. Clark's requirements is the CC ( constant current or current controlled ) output which is found only on the best zappers. One advantage of Stabilized Output is feeling. Zappers using this technology feel stronger, thus increasing the placebo effect. While it may not actually work better, it makes you think so because you feel it.
ParaZapper ™CC2, ParaZapper ™UZI-3, and ParaZapper ™MY all offer CC technology on their outputs.
- Positive offset as specified by Dr. Clark is included in almost every zapper, and is definitely in all of our products. Even better is the more advanced technology, pedestal offset, which provides a higher, more stabile positive offset of 0.5 volts instead of 0.25 volts. Note that Super Stabilized Output Zappers do not have true positive offset and can go negative under load!
ParaZapper ™UZI-3, and ParaZapper ™MY offer pedestal offset technology on their outputs.
The best zapper will have Positive offset square wave.
Even better is Pedestal Offset.
Zapper Features to avoid
- Super Stabilized output One zapper maker claims that this is great, we do not see any significant gains. From our testing results, it does not produce significantly better results. Additionally, any zapper with the super stabilized output does not meet Dr. Clark's requirement for positive output or for having no negative pulses. In our opinion, the super stabilized output is only hype and is only promoted by one manufacturer. Another problem with the super stabilized zapper is the absence of the output resistance as required by Dr. Clark. This basically results in an uncontrolled output that may cause nerve damage. For this reason, the super stabilized output does not meet Dr. Clark's requirements.
The best zapper will NOT have Super Stabilized Output.
- Sweep Frequency will change the frequency up or down over a period of time in order to try to achieve the right frequency needed. The real problem is that unless this process lasts for hours, the right frequency will not be kept on long enough to be completely effective. Great in theory, but it does not produce real lasting results because the zapper does not remain at any one frequency long enough to be completely effective.
- Faster Zapping - Many if not almost all currently manufactured zappers produce faster and better results than the original Clark Zapper, and many manufacturers claim that theirs produces results in 1 minute or 2 minutes, vs 7 minutes, or longer. The truth about this is that they may produce some noticeable results in a short time as ours do. The problem that we found in these studies is that when these zappers are used for this short of a period, the results are not as long lasting as they would be if they were used longer. Truth be told, it takes a while for problems to develope and while we all would like an instant result, it is not wise to expect this. So the real question to ask is,do I want a little bit fast, or do I want to allow time to make a large improvement?
- Long battery life: Sorry, some companies sacrifice effectiveness in order to conserve battery power. A standard 9-volt battery provides about 150 mAh. If your zapper last 150 hours of usage, then you can only get 1 mA of current. That is not enough! For ideal effectiveness, a minimum of 2 to 4 mA is a good value, more is better up to a limit. Our zappers provide the maximum battery life that can be obtained without sacrificing current. Buying a low power zapper to save a few dollers worth of batteries does not make sense when effectiveness is sacrificed.
As an analogy, a 100 mpg automobile would be great, but it might not be able to climb a very steep hill.
The zapper works amazingly to kill microbes such as bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and possibly even virus in water which is why we sell them for that purpose. Since the human body is mostly water, it would make sense that it would have possible positive effects. Our zappers range in price from about $129.00 to over $350.00, depending on the model and features. If you can not afford one, simply try battery tapping.